Reading Nietzsche: the Nazis Ruin Everything

“Europe is not so small,” Nietzsche wrote in a letter to his sister, Elisabeth, in March of 1885, “and if one does not want to live in Germany (and in this I am like him), one still does not need to go so very far away. But of course I do not have his enthusiasm for ‘things German,’ and even less for keeping this ‘glorious’ race pure. On the contrary, on the contrary—”

The “him” in this case is Dr. Förster, husband of Nietzsche’s sister and all-around horrible person. He left Germany in 1886 to emigrate to Paraguay, and in the following year he set up a colony known as “Nueva Germania”—sort of like a Jonestown for delusional Right-Wing ideologues.

Nietzsche earlier wrote in a letter to his friend, Malwilda, about the rift with his sister over the good doctor:

Meanwhile the situation has been changed by my radical break with my sister; for heaven’s sake, do not think that you should mediate between us and reconcile us—there can be no reconciliation between a vindictive anti-Semitic goose and me.

Now read this article by David B. Dennis, professor of history at Loyola University in Chicago, (“How the Nazi Party Recast Nietzsche”) about how the Nazis, with the help of Nietzsche’s sister, of course, co-opted (and by co-opted I mean completely changed) Nietzsche for their own twisted ends. He writes (apologies for the long quote, but it’s telling):

Cultural renewal in accordance with such perceptions of intellectual history was a central premise of the larger project of the Third Reich, fundamental to Hitler’s aims. But this agenda also contributed to the most destructive impulses of the movement. Indeed, German cultural identity as shaped by the Nazi regime did not merely justify anti-Semitism or policies of extermination, it led to them. Hitler’s racist standards of judgment were grounded in cultural terms, as he stated in Mein Kampf: “If we were to divide mankind into three groups, the founders of culture, the bearers of culture, the destroyers of culture, only the Aryan could be considered as the representative of the first group.” According to the Völkischer Beobachter, Jewish creators such as Heine, Meyerbeer, Mendelssohn, Mahler, and Schoenberg—among many others—supposedly belonged in the latter, so they and their kind had to be eradicated.

Demonstrating that great cultural figures of the past would have agreed with these premises was a priority in the Nazi newspaper. One contributor put it in these stark terms: “to win over to our movement spiritual leaders who think they see something distasteful in anti-Semitism, it is extremely important to present more and more evidence that great, recognized spirits shared our hatred of Jewry.”

In the case of Nietzsche, however, this process required a little more “spin” than the “selective scavenging” for biographical and textual evidence that scholar Steven Aschheim identified as the usual mode of such politicization. Some Völkischer Beobachter contributors recognized that Nietzsche had not been a committed anti-Semite, and had even criticized the anti-Semitic views of Richard Wagner, his own sister, Elisabeth, and her husband, Bernhard Förster. One editor, for instance, said about Nietzsche: “His work contains other crass contradictions and obscurities, especially in his treatment of the Jewish Question, where he sometimes confesses himself as an Anti-Semite, and then as a philo-Semite. Equally obscure is what he understood as race and nation. This may be a result of the eruptive nature of his creativity and the shortness of his life, which didn’t allow him enough time to go into these issues deeply.”

But other contributors wrote as if aligning Nietzschean ideas with Nazi anti-Semitism posed no difficulties at all. One article listed carefully selected passages from Beyond Good and Evil to show that Nietzsche “expressed himself extraordinarily farsightedly on the Jewish Question.” An article entitled “Nietzsche as Warner about the Jewish Danger” insisted that Nietzsche concerned himself with the Jewish Question, “as every clear thinking, every sensitive Aryan-German person must.” Nietzsche, the paper said, recognized the danger threatening Germans in the form of a completely foreign and utterly different race, and “warned us—and like so many hundreds of great, significant men who warned us before him, he warned in vain!”

And so, like usual, Nazis ruin everything for everybody.

3 thoughts on “Reading Nietzsche: the Nazis Ruin Everything

  1. What’s so special about the Nazis having misunderstood/falsified Nietzsche’s ideas? You blame them as if being able to grasp Nietzsche’s ideas was the norm, lol when in reality there were barely 20 people in this world who completely understood him.

    For someone who’s been studying Nietzsche with interest, your post reeks of senseless moralism. Why is Förtser a “horrible person”? Are murderers and rapists “horrible persons” too? Were Alexander the Great, Caesar and Napoleon all “horrible persons”? And what about Hitler?

    And as for the Nazis having “ruined” Nietzsche: newsflash, they haven’t. Nietzsche’s works are all available to us today in top-notch English translations for anyone to interpret them as they wish. Nietzsche was not ruined by Nazis; the most they ruined were perhaps a few Jews here and there.

  2. Wow. I usually don’t delete comments unless they’re spam, because I’m interested in an honest critique of my thoughts and opinions. I am, however, tempted to delete your comment, because you’re either A. a Nazi, or B. the worst kind of time-wasting troll. So let it be clear that I don’t wish to dignify your comment with a response, but rather I am asking that you please stop posting this kind of crap on my blog. Thanks.

  3. I’m even more disappointed with your response now. It may be extremely hard for you to recognize this, but I’m neither a Nazi, nor a “troll”. I’m aware my post might come off as offensive if you’re Jewish, but “in literature politeness is an alien” (see Schopenhauer). If you can’t write what you feel for fear of hurting someone’s feelings, you’ll never write anything worth reading. I’m sorry, but this is the truth — and truth is hard.

    I enjoy your website, but was disappointed (not to say outraged…) with this Nazi post and its blatant moralism. The job of the philosopher is to think and analyze the world, and he must not be afraid of hurting people’s feelings. The philosopher WILL draw all the consequences from whatever observations he makes, and whether some weakling can or cannot handle the truth is none of his business.

    And what really disappointed me now was seeing that the mere THOUGHT of Hitler not being a “horrible person” was enough to send you through the roof. Again, I enjoy reading your website and it pains me to be so patronizing to you, but you really have to read more of Nietzsche.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s